Texas Hospital Workers Sue Over Vaccine Mandates

June 1, 2021 — A group of 117 people who work at Houston Methodist Health System has filed a lawsuit against the medical center, objecting to its policy of requiring employees and contractors to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or risk losing their jobs.

Plaintiffs include Jennifer Bridges, a medical-surgical nurse at the hospital who has become the public face and voice of health care workers who object to mandatory vaccination, as well as Bob Nevens, the hospital’s director of corporate risk.

Nevens says the hospital was requiring him to be vaccinated even though he doesn’t treat patients and has been working from home for most of the past year.

“My civil rights and liberties have been trampled on,” he says in comments posted on an online petition. “My right to protect myself from unknown side effects of these vaccines has been placed below the optics of ‘Leading Medicine.’”

Nevens says in his comments that he was fired on April 15, although the lawsuit says he is currently employed by the hospital’s corporate office.

The Texas attorney who filed the lawsuit, Jared Woodfill, is known to champion conservative causes. In March 2020, he challenged Harris County’s stay-at-home order, charging that it violated religious liberty. He was chairman of the Harris County Republican Party for more than a decade. His website says he is a frequent guest on the local Fox News affiliate.

The lawsuit hinges on a section of the federal law that authorizes emergency use of medical products: U.S. Code 360bbb-3.

That law says people who get the medical product should be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequence, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.”

Legal experts are split on what the provision means for vaccination mandates. Courts have not yet weighed in on how they stand on the law.

The petition also repeats a popular anti-vaccination argument that likens requiring a vaccine approved for emergency use to the kind of medical experiments done by Nazi doctors on Jewish prisoners in concentration camps. It says forcing people to choose between an experimental vaccine and a job is a violation of the Nuremberg Code, which says that human subjects must voluntarily and knowingly consent to taking part in research.

Source link

What do you think?

12 Points
Upvote Downvote

Leave a Reply